Despite a significant amount of information on approaches to managing patients with craniofacial tumors, the increasing number of modern high-tech technologies, there remain a number of controversial issues regarding the choice of treatment strategy that fully satisfies the requirements of objective assessment of effectiveness and the improvement of quality of life for patients suffering from oncological disease. Craniofacial approaches sufficiently adhere to oncological principles and allow for the removal of even extensive tumors which greatly improve immediate and long-term outcomes, reliably enhancing quality of life, which is the most important task in the surgery of malignant skull base tumors. As evident from the aforementioned modifications and classical approaches to reconstruction of defects following craniofacial resections, in order to summarize the vast amount of information on the advantages and disadvantages of corresponding methods, a multicenter independent prospective study is needed, during which data from different clinics would undergo critical analysis using modern evidence-based medicine methods. On the path to methodological comprehension of existing concepts and actions towards creating one’s own algorithms lies a multifactorial analysis of personal experience in management and undoubtedly the care of patients from a group with such an unfavorable prognosis for survival. An immediate observation that follows the realization of the practical significance of a surgical treatment algorithm common to all physicians and mid-level medical staff is that the most effective achievement of the above task lies in learning from one’s own mistakes during patient care. Very encouraging research results, in which attempts are made at mastering new materials, herald a future scientific breakthrough in craniofacial reconstruction. The use of bioprosthetics and synthetic analogs is particularly relevant for those patients for whom reconstruction using their own tissues is contraindicated for various reasons. This article demonstrates the most outstanding achievements in the treatment of patients with sinonasal tumors.

Malignant tumors of the sinonasal region are rare and highly diverse in their histological origin neoplasms, accounting for an average of 0.2–1.1 % of all newly diagnosed tumors. Risk factors, to varying degrees pathogenetically linked to disease progression, include a mutation of the TP53 gene in 80 % of cases, prolonged exposure to industrial air pollutants, smoking, male gender, and age over 55 years in 85 % of cases, infection with human papillomavirus and Epstein–Barr virus. Despite a substantial amount of information on approaches to managing this patient population, the increasing number of modern technology-intensive methods has led to ongoing debates regarding the selection of a treatment strategy that fully meets the requirements for objectively assessing efficacy and improving the quality of life of patients suffering from oncological disease.

Aim. To investigate modern approaches to treatment of patients with tumors of the craniocephalic location, identify factors of surgical treatment success and favorable long-term prognosis, develop a management algorithm for patients with sinonasal neoplasms, provide rationale for using various reconstruction techniques for postresection defects. Systemic approach to the analysis of effectiveness and expediency of modern approaches to treatment of patients with tumors of the craniocephalic region requires integration of several key concepts. Taking into account individual characteristics of the patient by an experienced surgical team can lead to good treatment results including increased survival rates.

Development of algorithms for management of patients of this category and individualization of selection of reconstructive techniques are important problems in practical healthcare. Minimization of complications is one of the main goals of postoperative patient observation. The optimal approach to treatment even in this prospectless in the context of survival and social rehabilitation group of patients assumes greatest possible preservation of facial esthetic features and increased quality of life which can be achieved only with well-coordinated work of highly professional interdisciplinary team.