Results of using revascularized flaps in patients with oral cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Authors: Musin S.I.1, Menshikov K.V.1,2, Sultanbaev A.V.1,2, Sharafutdinov N.A.1, Zamilov M.M.1, Ayupov R.T.1, Nasretdinov A.F.1, Guz A.O.3, Fatkullin D.M.1, Rudyk A.N.4,5,6
-
Affiliations:
- Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
- Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Center of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine
- Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of Republic of Tatarstan named after Prof.M. Z. Sigal
- Kazan State Medical Academy – a branch of Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Scientific Research Laboratory “Biomarker”, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology of the Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
- Issue: Vol 15, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 56-65
- Section: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF HEAD AND NECK TUMORS
- Published: 09.07.2025
- URL: https://ogsh.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/1072
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2025-15-2-56-65
- ID: 1072
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. In Russia, cancer of the oral mucosa is diagnosed in more than 9500 patients every year. In 65–70 % of cases, the disease is diagnosed at stages III–IV. Despite the use of combination treatment, prognosis in patients with stage III and IVA oral mucosa cancer remains unfavorable. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered a strategy to decrease the risk of distant metastasis, decrease tumor volume, and affect the status of surgical resection margins.
Aim. To evaluate the results of using revascularized flaps in patients with resectable stage III and IVA cancer of the oral mucosa who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Materials and methods. Retrospective analysis of data of 41 patients who underwent surgery in 2020–2023 at the Republican Clinical Oncological Dispensary (Ufa) was performed. All patients underwent R0 resection with subsequent defect reconstruction using revascularized flaps. Two groups were compared: primary patients (n = 31) and patients who received neoadjuvant therapy per the DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5‑fluorouracil) (n = 10) scheme.
Results. Overall rate of complications in the groups of primary patients and patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy per the DCF scheme was 16.1 and 20 %, respectively (p = 0.398), however the rate of flap loss was significantly higher in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 40 % versus 9.7 % (p = 0.047). Recurrence rate in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group was 10 %, in the group without neoadjuvant therapy it was 38.7 % (p = 0.129).
Conclusion. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be associated with higher risk of microvascular complications and flap loss but it decreases the recurrence rate. Therefore, further search for the optimal treatment strategy for patients with cancer of the oral mucosa is necessary.
About the authors
Sh. I. Musin
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Author for correspondence.
Email: Musin_shamil@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1185-977X
Shamil Ismagilovich Musin
73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
Russian FederationK. V. Menshikov
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan;Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3734-2779
73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054;
3 Leninа St., Ufa 450008
Russian FederationA. V. Sultanbaev
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan;Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0996-5995
73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054;
3 Leninа St., Ufa 450008
Russian FederationN. A. Sharafutdinov
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-4933-7236
73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
Russian FederationM. M. Zamilov
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0918-3993
73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
Russian FederationR. T. Ayupov
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6769-7194
73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
Russian FederationA. F. Nasretdinov
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8340-7962
73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
Russian FederationA. O. Guz
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Center of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8164-2261
42 Blukher St., Chelyabinsk 454087
Russian FederationD. M. Fatkullin
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9533-4107
450054 Уфа, пр-кт Октября, 73/1
Russian FederationA. N. Rudyk
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of Republic of Tatarstan named after Prof.M. Z. Sigal;Kazan State Medical Academy – a branch of Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia;
Scientific Research Laboratory “Biomarker”, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology of the Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7309-9043
29 Sibirskiy Trakt, Kazan 420029;
36 Butlerova St., Kazan 420012;
Bld. 1, 18 Kremlevskaya St., Kazan 420008
Russian FederationReferences
- The state of oncological care for the Russian population in 2020. Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2021. 236 p. (In Russ.).
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Head and Neck Cancers. Version 2.2025 https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/p https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/head-and-neck.pdfdf/head-and-neck.pdf
- Malignant neoplasms of the oral cavity. Clinical recommendations. 2024. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/164_2
- Zanoni D.K., Montero P.H., Migliacci J.C. et al. Survival outcomes after treatment of cancer of the oral cavity (1985–2011). Cancer 2016;122(14):2314–22. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.02.001
- Pulte D., Brenner H. Changes in survival in head and neck cancers in the late 20th and early 21st century: a period analysis. Oncologist 2010;15(9):994–1001. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0289
- Pignon J.P., le Maître A., Maillard E., Bourhis J. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 2009;92(1):4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.014
- Cohen E.E.W., Karrison T.G., Kocherginsky M. et al. Phase III randomized trial of induction chemotherapy in patients with N2 or N3 locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(25):2735–43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.6309
- Haddad R., O’Neill A., Rabinowits G. et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (sequential chemoradiotherapy) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer (PARADIGM): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(3):257–64. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70011-1
- Lacas B., Carmel A., Landais C. et al. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 107 randomized trials and individual patient data meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2021;156:281–93. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.013
- Ghi M.G., Paccagnella A., Ferrari D. et al.; GSTTC Italian Study Group. Induction TPF followed by concomitant treatment versus concomitant treatment alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer. A phase II–III trial. Ann Oncol 2017;28(9):2206–12. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx299
- Licitra L., Grandi C., Guzzo M. et al. Primary chemotherapy in resectable oral cavity squamous cell cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2003;21(2):327–33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.146
- Zhong L.P., Zhang C.P., Ren G.X. et al. Randomized phase III trial of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by surgery versus up-front surgery in locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2013;31(6):744–51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.8820
- Zhong L.P., Zhang C.P., Ren G.X. et al. Long-term results of a randomized phase III trial of TPF induction chemotherapy followed by surgery and radiation in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2015;6(21):18707–14. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4531
- Bossi P., Lo Vullo S., Guzzo M. et al. Preoperative chemotherapy in advanced resectable OCSCC: long-term results of a randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2014;25(2):462–6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt555
- Tonsbeek A.M., van der Lely J.N., Bulstra L. et al. Long-term health-related quality of life in oral cancer survivors following microvascular tongue reconstruction. Oral Oncol 2025;166:107363. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107363
- Tschiesner U., Schuster L., Strieth S., Harréus U. Functional outcome in patients with advanced head and neck cancer: surgery and reconstruction with free flaps versus primary radiochemotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269(2):629–38. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1642-7
- Hitt R., Grau J.J., López-Pousa A. et al. A randomized phase III trial comparing induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol 2014;25(1): 216–25. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt461
- Hitt R., Iglesias L., López-Pousa A. et al. Long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy alone as treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer: follow-up of the Spanish Head and Neck Cancer Group (TTCC) 2503 Trial. Clin Transl Oncol 2020. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02467-8
- Paccagnella A., Ghi M.G., Loreggian L. et al. Gruppo di Studio Tumori della Testa e del Collo XRP 6976 F/2501 Study. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus induction docetaxel, cisplatin and 5 fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: a phase II randomized study. Ann Oncol 2010;21(7):1515–22. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp573
- Dauzier E., Lacas B., Blanchard P. et al. Role of chemotherapy in 5000 patients with head and neck cancer treated by curative surgery: a subgroup analysis of the meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2019;95:106–14. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.001
- Ma J., Liu Y., Yang X. et al. Induction chemotherapy in patients with resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a metaanalysis. World J Surg Oncol 2013;11:67. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-67
- Hsu C.L., Wen Y.W., Wang H.M. et al. Prognostic impact of bridge or neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy in patients with resected oral cavity cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Cancer Med 2024;13(15):e70061. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70061
- Kiong K.L., Lin F.Y., Yao C.M.K.L. et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on perioperative morbidity after major surgery for head and neck cancer. Cancer 2020;126(19):4304–14. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33103
- Kuan C.H., Chung M.J., Hong R.L. et al. The impacts of intraarterial chemotherapy on head and neck microvascular reconstruction. J Formos Med Assoc 2020;119(10):1524–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.12.002
- Sabitovic A., Trøstrup H., Damsgaard T.E. The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical outcomes following autologous and implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023;87:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.09.048
- Varghese J., Gohari S.S., Rizki H. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on complications following immediate breast reconstruction. Breast 2021;55:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.023
- Temam S., Kawaguchi H., El-Naggar A.K. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor copy number alterations correlate with poor clinical outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(16):2164–70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.6605
- Yang C.Z., Ma J., Zhu D.W. et al. GDF15 is a potential predictive biomarker for TPF induction chemotherapy and promotes tumorigenesis and progression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2014;25(6):1215–22. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu120
- Zhu D.W., Liu Y., Yang X. et al. Low annexin A1 expression predicts benefit from induction chemotherapy in oral cancer patients with moderate or poor pathologic differentiation grade. BMC Cancer 2013;13:301. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-301
- Song H., Lou C., Ma J. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals changes of tumor immune microenvironment in oral squamous cell carcinoma after chemotherapy. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022;10:914120. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.914120
- Ferris R.L., Spanos W.C., Leidner R. et al. Neoadjuvant nivolumab for patients with resectable HPV-positive and HPV-negative squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck in the CheckMate 358 trial. J Immunother Cancer 2021;9(6):e002568. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002568
- Zhao X., Zhou Y., Peng G. et al. Final analysis of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2024;156:106918. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106918
- Li B., Xie S., Han J. et al. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2025;111(1):781–90. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001891
Supplementary files


