Email this article 
Current aspects of treatment and rehabilitation of patients with pharyngeal cancer
- Authors: Kozhanov A.L.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University at the Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: Vol 6, No 2 (2016)
- Pages: 17-25
- Section: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF HEAD AND NECK TUMORS
- Published: 22.06.2016
- URL: https://ogsh.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/204
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2016-6-2-17-25
- ID: 204
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Annually in Russia primary diagnosis of new-onset pharyngeal cancer is made in approximately 6–7 thousand people. To modern methods of diagnosing pharyngeal cancer belong: direct and indirect laryngoscopy, microlaryngoscopy, stroboscopy, fibrolaryngoscopy, X-ray study examination, computed tomography, multispiral computed tomography, magnetic resonance tomography, ultrasonographic examination of the throat and organs of the neck, acoustic analysis of voice and morphological studies.
Recent years witnessed the development of novel methods of both conservative and surgical management of patient with pharyngeal cancer. Treatment of patients with stage T1–2 and in some patients with stage T3 includes the following methods: radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, endolaryngeal surgery with laser, photodynamic therapy, open functionally sparing operations. According to the data of the authors, today currently there is no common algorithm for treatment of stage T1–3 pharyngeal malignant neoplasms.
Locally disseminated tumors of the throat and laryngopharynx, corresponding to stages T3–4N0–2M0 as a rule are treated by combined management with pre- or postoperative irradiation. Such approach results in leads to impairment of all functions of the organ and invalidity disablement of patients. The most important task after combined treatment is rehabilitation of the voice function, which may be restored by means of logopedic methods, voice-forming devices and reconstructive plastic operations.
Hence novel approaches to treatment of pharyngeal cancer – both conservative and surgical have recently been worked out. However the problem concerning regarding therapeutic decision-making followed by rehabilitation of patients remains disputable.
About the authors
A. L. Kozhanov
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University at the Ministry of Health of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: kojanov_a@mail.ru
Department of Otorhinolaryngology,
1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow, 117997
Russian FederationReferences
Supplementary files
