Organ-saving surgical treatment of locally advanced and recurrent laryngeal cancer
https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2025-15-2-14-25
Abstract
Introduction. Treatment of locally advanced laryngeal cancer is a complex problem and should be aimed at saving the organ. Chemoradiation therapy is ineffective in 30 % of cases. Oncological outcomes of surgical treatment are better than outcomes of conservative methods, but the patient loses the larynx. Therefore, organ-saving surgical intervention in the form of various types of extended resections of the larynx depending on the location of the tumor remains an important problem of clinical oncology.
Aim. To analyze the results of extended resections of the larynx as a method of organ-saving surgical treatment of patients with locally advanced and recurrent laryngeal cancer depending on tumor location, advancement, and previous treatment.
Materials and methods. The study included 67 patients with locally advanced and recurrent laryngeal cancer who underwent extended resections of the larynx using techniques developed at the N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology with the aim of performing organ-saving treatment. Stages of performing various extended resections of the larynx depending on tumor location are presented. Retrospective analysis of data on 37 patients who were followed up for 5 or more years was performed, clinical progression of the disease is discussed, and 5‑year recurrence-free and overall survival are presented, as well as the results of functional and social rehabilitation of the patients.
Results. Between 2010 and 2025 at the N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 67 patients with stage III–IVa cancer or tumor recurrence after previous unsuccessful treatment underwent various extended resections of the larynx depending on tumor location. After organ-saving surgical intervention, in all 67 patients rehabilitation of all functions of the organ with restoration of the separation biomechanics (between breathing and swallowing), breathing, vocalization was achieved at the level sufficient for social and labor rehabilitation. The five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 89.2 and 87.1 %, respectively.
Conclusion. The obtained data demonstrate the effectiveness of extended resections of locally advanced and recurrent laryngeal cancer. After surgery, the patients are fully functionally and socially rehabilitated without compromising oncological results which are similar to the results of laryngectomy.
About the Authors
R. I. AzizyanRussian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
D. K. Stelmakh
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
S. O. Podvyaznikov
Russian Federation
Sergey Olegovich Podvyaznikov
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522;
2/1 Barricadnaya St., 123995 Moscow
References
1. The state of oncological care for the Russian population in 2023. Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2024. 262 p. (In Russ.).
2. Ogoltsova E.S., Matyakin E.G. Tactical errors in determining indications for the treatment of patients with laryngeal cancer. In: Diagnostic and tactical errors in laryngeal cancer. Moscow: Meditsina, 1989. Pp. 100–130. (In Russ.).
3. Randall M.E., Springer D.J., Raven M. T1–T2 carcinoma of the glottic: relative hypofractionation. Radiology 1991;179(2):569571. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.179.2.2014313
4. Choynzonov E.L., Kitsmanyuk Z.D., Zobnina M.N. et al. The influence of morphological features of the tumor on the clinical course and prognosis of laryngeal cancer. Zhurnal ushnykh, nosovykh i gorlovykh bolezney = Journal of Ear, Nasal and Throat Diseases 1995;1:5–8. (In Russ.).
5. Pontes P., Brasil Ode O., Amorim Filho Fde S. et al. Radiotherapy for early glottic cancer and salvage surgery after recurrence. Brazi J Otorhinolaryngol 2011;77(3):299–302. DOI: 10.1590/s1808-86942011000300005
6. Campo F., Mazzola F., Bianchi G. et al. Partial laryngectomy for naïve pT3N0 laryngeal cancer: systematic review on oncological outcomes. Head Neck 2023;45(1):243–50. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27205
7. Colizza A., Ralli M., D’Elia C. et al. Voice quality after transoral CO2 laser microsurgery (TOLMS): systematic review of literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022;279(9):4247–55. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07418-335505113
8. Arboleda L.P.A., Neves A.B., Kohler H.F. et al. Oncological outcome of vocal cord-only radiotherapy for cT1–T2 glottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2023;6(8):e1837. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1837
9. De Ridder M., Rijken J.A., Smits H.J.G. et al. Voice quality after transoral CO2 laser microsurgery (TOLMS): systematic review of literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023;280(7):3345–52. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-07904-2
10. Rigal T., Baudouin R., Circiu M. et al. Overview of glottic laryngeal cancer treatment recommendation changes in the NCCN guidelines from 2011 to 2022. OTO Open 2024;8(2):e125. DOI: 10.1002/oto2.125
11. Crosetti E., Bertolin A., Molteni G. et al. Patterns of recurrence after open partial horizontal laryngectomy types II and III: univariate and logistic regression analysis of risk factors. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2019;39(4):235–43. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-2409
12. Ling Z., Hu G., Wang Z. et al. Prognostic impact of different tumor invasion patterns in the surgical treatment of T3 glottic laryngeal cancer. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2023;37(12):998–1004. (In Chinese). DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.12.015
13. De Vincentiis M., Greco A., Campo F. et al. Open partial horizontal laryngectomy for T2–T3–T4a laryngeal cancer: oncological outcomes and prognostic factors of two Italian hospitals. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022;279(6):2997–3004. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07238-x
14. Bianco M.R., Saita V., Occhiuzzi F. et al. Long-term complications of tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis. Clin Med 2024;13(7):1912. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071912
15. Bertolin A., Laura E., Cena I. et al. The role of central neck dissection and adjuvant treatment in pT4aN0 laryngeal carcinoma treated with open partial horizontal laryngectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024;281(10):5385–93. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08799-3
16. Svetlakov M.I. Cancerous tumors of the larynx: monograph. Leningrad: Meditsina, 1964. 310 p. (In Russ.).
17. Atlas of operative otorhinolaryngology. Ed. by V.S. Pogosov. Moscow: Meditsina, 1983. 416 p. (In Russ.).
18. Svetitsky P.V., Volkova V.L., Aedinova I.V. et al. Functional-sparing surgery for locally advanced laryngeal cancer. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education 2016;3:16–21. (In Russ.).
19. Kozhanov L.G., Sdvizhkov A.M., Kozhanov A.L. et al. Open laryngectomy: clinical experience. Opukholi golovy i shei = Head and Neck Tumors 2017;7(4):35–40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/2222-1468-2017-7-4-35-40
20. Mukhamedov M.S., Choynzonov E.L., Gyunter V.E. The use of bioadaptive implants based on titanium nickelide. Vestnik RONC im. N.N. Blokhina = Bulletin of the N.N. Blokhin Russian Scientific Research Center 2010;21(1):65–71. (In Russ.).
21. Mirazizov K.D., Khramtsovsky V.V., Aluni F.Yu. Laryngeal reconstruction after hemilaryngectomy for cancer. Abstracts of the All-Union Conference. Tomsk, 1991. Pp. 102–103. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Azizyan R.I., Stelmakh D.K., Podvyaznikov S.O. Organ-saving surgical treatment of locally advanced and recurrent laryngeal cancer. Head and Neck Tumors (HNT). 2025;15(2):14-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2025-15-2-14-25