SURGERY FOR TUMORS OF THE FOURTH VENTRICLE: THE CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCESSES AND THE ROLE OF ENDOSCOPIC TECHNIQUES
https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2012-0-4-10-18
Abstract
The use of current accesses to the tumors of the fourth ventricle, which fill and compress from the outside its cavity, was assessed in 28 patients. Original associated endomicrosurgical techniques were used. Two groups and five topographic types of fourth ventricle tumors are identified. Basic accesses — telovelar and supracerebellar — eliminate the necessity of dissecting the vermis cerebelli. The key endoscopic technique is to provide a simultaneous survey of the lower and upper poles of a tumor during its removal. The technique of trochlear removal of metastatic nodes from the fourth ventricle is shown. The benefits of endoscopic techniques are to early examine the vulnerable vascular and neural structures blocked by a tumor at the access step; to reduce the volume of an access itself and the traction of cerebellar and truncal structures; to completely survey the Sylvian aqueduct without additionally displacing or dissecting the vermis cerebelli; to maintain optical sharpness within sight of differently remote microstructures. Overall, incorporation of the endoscopic method realizes the principle of mini-invasive neurosurgery.
About the Author
V. B. KarakhanRussian Federation
References
1. Шелия Р.Н. Опухоли желудочковой системы головного мозга. Л.: Медицина, 1973. 263 с.
2. Григорян Ю.А., Ситников А.Р. Теловелярный (паратонзиллярный) доступ к четвертому желудочку. Рос нейрохирург журнал им. проф. А.Л. Поленова 2009;1(4):49–58.
3. Карахан В.Б. Сопряженная эндомикрохирургическая технология при удалении краниобазальных опухолей. Малоинвазивная нейрохирургия. СПб., 2006. С. 22–29.
4. El-Bahy K. Telovelar approach to the fourth ventricle: operative findings and results in 16 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005;147(2):137–42.
5. Matsushima T., Inoue T., Inamura T. et al. Transcerebellomedullary fissure approach with special reference to methods of dissecting the fissure. J Neurosurg 2001;94(2):257–64.
6. Mussi A.C.M., Rhoton A.L. Jr. Telovelar approach to the fourth ventricle: microsurgical anatomy. J Neurosurg 2000; 92(5):812–23.
7. Tanriover N., Ulm A.J., Rhoton A.L. Jr, Yasuda A. Comparison of the transvermian and telovelar approaches to the fourth ventricle. J Neurosurg 2004;101(3):484–98. Karakhan V.B. Endofiberscopic intracracranial stereotopography and endofiberscoppic neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1992;54:11–25.
8. Реrneczky A., Tschabitscher M., Resch K.D.M. Endoscopic anatomy for neurosurgery. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme, 1993, p. 245–255.
9. Rhoton A.L. Jr. The cerebellar arteries. Neurosurgery 2000; 47(3 Suppl): s29–68.
10. Карахан В.Б., Алешин В.А., Фу Р.Г. и др. Новые хирургические технологии удаления метастазов рака в головном мозге в зависимости от топографии, количества и макроструктуры опухолевых узлов. Современные проблемы нейроонкологии. М.: Изд. РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН, 2007. С. 6–12.
Review
For citations:
Karakhan V.B. SURGERY FOR TUMORS OF THE FOURTH VENTRICLE: THE CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCESSES AND THE ROLE OF ENDOSCOPIC TECHNIQUES. Head and Neck Tumors (HNT). 2012;(4):10-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2012-0-4-10-18