Modern oncological classification of maxillary and mandibular defects, combined defects of the oral and maxillofacial region

After radical removal of regional tumors of the middle third of the face, defects of facial skeleton and adjacent anatomical structures in the maxillofacial region develop, including defects of the floor of the mouth, tongue, oropharynx, base of the skull, orbital tissues. Surgeons have proposed several classifications aimed at categorization of complexity and volume of the defects and promoting easier selection of the type of reconstruction. This article describes the main classifications of maxillary and mandibular defects. All classifications consider the problem from the point of view of a different practical approach, but most of them haven’t received wide acceptance. The available classifications do not fully take into account all components of the defects forming after surgical treatment of regional tumors. The authors propose a modification of the classification of maxillary defects by J. S. Brown and R. J. Shaw (2010). The modified classification should include not only bone defects but also other parts of the maxilla: epithelium, oropharynx, base of the skull, dura mater.
The authors present a classification of mandibular defects based on the classification by M. L. Urken et al. (1991). The new classification includes notations of mandibular regions as well as extraskeletal components of defects of the lower third of the face. The authors distinguish anatomo-functional regions of the maxilla and mandibula and 3 complexity categories of defects of the facial skeleton. This allows to determine the necessity of single flap or complex reconstruction and its staging. The article also describes a classification developed at the P. A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, which considers combined defects of the maxilla and mandibula and takes into account adjacent resected anatomical structures.
The proposed classifications allow to categorize defects after resection of the maxillofacial area of any volume including removal of regional tumors, and promote optimal selection of the tactics of surgical reconstruction.

1. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2015 г. Под редакцией А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИРЦ» Минздрава России, 2016. [State of oncological care in Russia in 2015. Eds.: A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertzena – filial FGBU “NMIRC” Minzdrava Rossii, 2016. (In Russ.)].

2. Iyer S., Thankappan K. Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies Indian J Plast Surg 2014;47(1):8–19. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.129618.

3. Schultz B.D., Sosin M., Nam A. et al. Classification of mandible defects and algorithm for microvascular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135(4):743e–54e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001106.

4. Kumar B.P., Venkatesh V., Kumar K.A. et al. Mandibular Reconstruction: Overview. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2016;15(4):425–41. Epub 2015 Apr 19. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-015-0766-5. PMID: 27833334.

5. Alam D., Ali Y., Klem C., Coventry D. The Evolution of Complex Microsurgical Midface Reconstruction: A Classification Scheme and Reconstructive Algorithm. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016;24(4):593–603. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2016.06.012.

6. Schultz B.D., Sosin M Nam A. et al. Classification of mandible defects and algorithm for microvascular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135(4):743e–54e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001106.

7. Akinmoladun V.I., Dosumu O.O., Olusanya A.A., Ikusika O.F. Maxillectomy defects: a suggested classification scheme. Afr J Med Med Sci 2013;42(2):171–5. PMID: 24377203.

8. Aramany M.A. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: classification. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40(5):554–7. PMID: 364015.

9. Spiro R.H., Strong E. W., Shah J.P. Maxillectomy and its classification. Head Neck 1997;19(4):309–14. PMID: 9213109.

10. Cordeiro P.G., Santamaria E. A classification system and algorithm for reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105(7):2331–48. PMID: 10845285.

11. Brown J.S., Rogers S.N., McNally D.N., Boyle M. A modified classification for the maxillectomy defect. Head Neck 2000;22(1):17–26. PMID: 10585601.

12. Okay D.J., Genden E., Buchbinder D., Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86(4):352–63. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.119524. PMID: 11677528.

13. Brown J.S., Shaw R.J. Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface: introducing a new classification. Lancet Oncol 2010;11(10):1001–8. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70113-3.

14. Durrani Z., Hussain S.G., Alam S.A. A study of classification systems for maxillectomy defects. J Pak Prosthodont Assoc 2013;01(02):117–24.

15. Cantor R., Curtis N.A. Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. I. Anatomic, physiologic, and psychologic considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25(4):446–57. PMID: 5279015.

16. Jewer D.D., Boyd J.B., Manktelow R.T. et al. Orofacial and mandibular reconstruction with the iliac crest free flap: a review of 60 cases and a new method of classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84(3):391–405. PMID: 2762397.

17. Boyd J.B., Gullane P.J., Rotstein L.E. et al. Classification of mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92(7):1266–75. PMID: 8248401.

18. Brown J.S., Barry C., Ho M., Shaw R. A new classification for mandibular defects after oncological resection. Lancet Oncol 2016;17(1):e23–30. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00310-1.

19. Urken M.L., Weinberg H., Vickery C. et al. Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite free flaps. Report of 71 cases and a new classification scheme for bony, soft-tissue, and neurologic defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

20. ;117:733–44. PMID: 1863438.