Preview

Head and Neck Tumors (HNT)

Advanced search

Open laryngectomy: Clinical experience

https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2017-7-4-35-40

Abstract

Introduction. The problem of treatment and rehabilitation of patients with laryngeal cancer has been a complicated and controversial one.
Important conditions for selection of the type and scale of functionally sparing surgical intervention are accurate preoperative diagnosis of advancement of the tumor and oncological appropriateness of the intervention. Currently, the problem of single-step reconstruction of lost laryngeal functions after organ-preserving surgeries remains open. For this purpose, researchers use both auto-/homografts and endoprosthetics made of various materials. In some cases, endoprosthetics in lyrengectomy didn’t allow to restore laryngeal lumen due to granulation tissue, cicatricial stenosis, laryngotracheomalacia.
The study objective is to increase treatment and rehabilitation effectiveness in patients with laryngeal cancer after open laryngectomy.
Materials and methods. Our experience is based on open laryngectomies in 86 patients performed at the Clinical Oncology Dispensary No. 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department in the period from 2011 to 2014. Primary laryngeal cancer was diagnosed in 84 (97.7 %) patients, recurrent laryngeal cancer after a full course of radiation therapy – in 2 (2.3 %) patients. Vertical laryngectomy was performed in 74 patients, horizontal – in 12 patients.
Vertical laryngectomies were performed for tumors located near the vocal and vestibular flaps, anterior commissure, subglottis, laryngeal sinus;
horizontal for tumors located near the epiglottis, vestibular flaps, vallecula, root of the tongue if arytenoids were intact and vocal cords were mobile. In the postoperative period, an important factor was restoration of the organ’s function through early rehabilitation of respiratory, vocal, and protective functions. Evaluation of the laryngeal lumen was performed using endoscopic examination. Any diagnosed ligatures, granulation tissue, scars were resected. Prior to decannulation, ultrasound examination of the larynx was performed. Effectiveness of vocal function restoration was evaluated using computer acoustic analysis of the voice.
Results. Restoration of the lost laryngeal functions after organ-preserving open laryngectomies in patients with laryngeal cancer is achieved through reconstruction of the remaining parts of the organ, formation of an adequate lumen for breathing through postoperative endoscopic correction, and early rehabilitation of respiratory, vocal, and protective function.
Conclusion. Open laryngectomies with restoration of the remaining parts and single-step reconstruction of the lumen with an endoprosthesis, as well as subsequent combined treatment, allowed to restore respiratory function in 93.1 % patients, vocal function – in 91.9 % patients.

About the Authors

L. G. Kozhanov
Clinical Oncology Dispensary No. 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
17/1 Baumanskaya St., Moscow 105005, Russia


A. M. Sdvizhkov
Clinical Oncology Dispensary No. 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
17/1 Baumanskaya St., Moscow 105005, Russia


A. L. Kozhanov
L.I. Sverzhevsky Scientific Research Clinical Institute of Otorhinolaryngology of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
18A-2 Zagorodnoe Highway, Moscow 117152, Russia


S. A. Kravtsov
Clinical Oncology Dispensary No. 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
17/1 Baumanskaya St., Moscow 105005, Russia


M. T. Bekov
Clinical Oncology Dispensary No. 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
17/1 Baumanskaya St., Moscow 105005, Russia


M. V. Mulyarets
Clinical Oncology Dispensary No. 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

17/1 Baumanskaya St., Moscow 105005, Russia



References

1. Пачес А. И. Опухоли головы и шеи. Клиническое руководство. М.: Практическая медицина, 2013. [Paches А. I. Head and neck tumors. Clinical guidelines. Мoscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2013. (In Russ.)].

2. Ша Дж. П., Пател С. Дж., Сингх Б. Хирургия и онкология головы и шеи. Под ред. И. В. Решетова. Пер. с англ. М.: Издательские технологии, 2016. [Sha J. P., Patel S. G., Singh B. Head and neck surgery and oncology. Ed. I.V. Reshetov. (Translation from English.) Moscow: Izdatelskie tekhnologii, 2016. (In Russ.)].

3. Алиева С. Б., Алымов Ю. В., Кропотов М. А. и др. Клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению рака гортани. Общероссийский союз общественных объединений. Ассоциация онкологов России. М., 2014. Доступно по: http://oncology-association. ru/docs/recomend/may2015/10vz-rek. pdf. [Alieva S. B., Alymov Ju. V., Kropotov M. A. et al. Klinicheskie rekomendacii po diagnostike i lecheniju raka gortani. Obshherossijskij sojuz obshhestvennyh obʼedinenij. Associacija onkologov Rossii. Moscow, 2014. Available at: http://oncology-association.ru/docs/ recomend/may2015/10vz-rek. pdf. (In. Russ.)].

4. Новожилова Е. Н., Федотов А. П., Чумаков И. Ф. и др. Опыт использования роботизированного СО2-лазера Lumenis при операциях на гортани трансоральным доступом. Head and Neck. Russian Journal. Голова и шея 2015;1:42–8. [Novozhilova E. N., Fedotov A. P., Chumakov I. F. et al. Experience of using robotic Lumenic CO2 laser in transoral laryngeal surgery. Golova i sheya = Head & Neck. Russian Journal 2015;1:42–8. (In Russ.)].

5. Landolfo V., Gervasio C. F., Riva G. et al. Prognostic role of margin status in open and CO2 laser cordectomy for T1a – T1b glottic cancer. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016; pii: S1808–8694(16)30240–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.11.006. PMID: 28110846.

6. Lucioni M., Bertolin A., Lionello M. et al. Open partial horizontal laryngectomy for salvage after failure of CO2 laserassisted surgery for glottic carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273(1):169–75. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3734-2. PMID: 26294221.

7. Peretti G., Piazza C., Mora F. et al. Reasonable limits for transoral laser microsurgery in laryngeal cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;24(2):135–9. DOI: 10.1097/ MOO.0000000000000240. PMID: 26963672.

8. Вернер Дж. А. Эндоларингеальные хирургические вмешательства. Пер. с нем. М.: Солид, 2005. C. 25–34. [Verner J. A. Endolaryngeal surgical interventions. Moscow: Solid, 2005. P. 25–34. (In Russ.)].

9. Zeitels S. M. Transoral and transcervical surgical innovations in the treatment of glottis cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2015;48(4):677–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2015.04.012.

10. Клочихин А. Л., Трофимов Е. И., Давыдова И. И. Оценка отдаленных результатов лечения рака гортани с применением полимерного эндопротезирования. Вестник оториноларингологии 2010;1:26–8. [Klochikhin A. L., Trofimov E. I., Davydova I. I. Evaluation of late results of laryngeal cancer treatment with the use of polymer endoprostheses. Vestnik otorinolaringologii = Otorhinolaryngology Herald 2010;1:26–8. (In. Russ.)].

11. Мухамедов М. Р., Кульбакин Д. Е., Гюнтер В. Э. и др. Органосохраняющие операции с применением имплантов из никелида титана у больных раком гортани. Сибирский онкологический журнал 2015;2(Прил.):33–5. [Mukhamedov M. R., Kulbakin D. E., Gunter B. E. et al. Organ-preserving surgeries using titanium nickelide implants in patients with laryngeal cancer. Sibirskiy onkologichesliy zhurnal = Siberian Journal of Oncology 2015;2(App.):33–5. (In Russ.)].

12. Мактыбаева Д. А. Региональные особенности злокачественного поражения гортани и обоснование переднебоковой резекции. Российская оториноларингология 2016;6(85):71–4. DOI: 10.18692/1810-4800-2016-6-71-74. [Maktybaeva D. A. Regional features of malignant lesions of larynx and its anterolateral resection substantiation. Rossiyskaya otorinolaringologiya = Russian Otorhinolaryngology 2016;6(85):71–4. (In. Russ.)].

13. Мухамедов М. Р., Чойнзонов Е. Л., Гюнтер В. Э. Использование биоадаптированных имплантов на основе никелида титана в хирургической реабилитации больных раком гортани (результаты десятилетнего кооперативного исследования). Вестник РОНЦ им. Н. Н. Блохина 2010;21(1):65–71. [Muhamedov M. R., Chojnzonov E. L., Gyunter V. E. Use of bioadapted implants on the titanium nickelide basis for surgical rehabilitation of patients with the larynx cancer (results of a ten-year cooperative study). Vestnik RONC im. N. N. Blokhina = Herald of the N. N. Blokhin 2010;21(1):65–71. (In. Russ.)].

14. Atallah I., Berta E., Coffre A. et al. Supracricoid partial laryngectomy with crico-hyoido-epiglottopexy for glottic carcinoma with anterior commissure involvement. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2017;37:188–94. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-1002. PMID: 28516961.

15. Breunig C., Benter P., Seidl R. O., Coordes A. Predictable swallowing function after open horizontal supraglottic partial laryngectomy. Auris Nasus Larynx 2016;43(6):658–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.01.003. PMID: 43(6):658–65.

16. Chen W., Gao P., Cui P. et al. Management of severe and complex hypopharyngeal and/or laryngotracheal stenoses by various open surgical procedures: a retrospective study of seventeen patients. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2016;78(2):111–8. DOI: 10.1159/000430820. PMID: 27031727.

17. Demir M. G., Paksoy M., Şanlı A. et al. Subjective and objective evaluation of voice and pulmonary function in partial laryngectomised patients. Integr Cancer Sci Ther 2016;3(1):349–53. DOI: 10.15761/ICST.1000168.

18. Nair S., Nilakantan A., Sood A. Challenges in the management of laryngeal stenosis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;68(3):294–9. DOI: 10.17140/ OTLOJ-2-129. PMID: 27508129.


Review

For citations:


Kozhanov L.G., Sdvizhkov A.M., Kozhanov A.L., Kravtsov S.A., Bekov M.T., Mulyarets M.V. Open laryngectomy: Clinical experience. Head and Neck Tumors (HNT). 2017;7(4):35-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2017-7-4-35-40

Views: 1055


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2222-1468 (Print)
ISSN 2411-4634 (Online)