Pectoral and trapezoidal flaps for reconstruction of full-thickness post-resection defect in combination treatment of locally advanced buccal cancer
https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2019-9-1-28-37
Abstract
The study objective is to compare short-term results of reconstruction of a full-thickness defect of the cheek using pectoral and trapezoidal flaps.
Materials and methods. Examination and treatment of 21 patients with locally advanced buccal cancer were performed at the Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncologic Dispensary in 2007–2018.
Results. Flap necrosis developed in 7 (33 %) patients: in 3 patients total, in 4 – marginal. No postoperative mortality was observed. For pectoral flap reconstruction, necrosis was observed in 2 cases (marginal necrosis of the skin graft). For trapezoidal flap buccal reconstruction, necrosis was observed in 5 patients (total in 3, marginal in 2).
Conclusion. Use of a trapezoidal flap is limited due to its anatomical characteristics and is associated with higher rate of necrosis despite better esthetic characteristics compared to a pectoral flap. Despite its larger volume compared to trapezoidal flap, pectoral flap has better blood supply which leads to low rate of necrosis.
About the Authors
D. V. SikorskyRussian Federation
11/1 Delovaya St., Nizhniy Novgorod 603126.
S. О. Podvyaznikov
Russian Federation
Bld. 1, 2/1 Barrikadnaya St., Moscow 125993.
A. N. Volodin
Russian Federation
11/1 Delovaya St., Nizhniy Novgorod 603126.
K. V. Bazanov
Russian Federation
11/1 Delovaya St., Nizhniy Novgorod 603126.
E. A. Molkova
Russian Federation
11/1 Delovaya St., Nizhniy Novgorod 603126.
M. I. Kopeykina
Russian Federation
11/1 Delovaya St., Nizhniy Novgorod 603126.
A. A. Egorov
Russian Federation
11/1 Delovaya St., Nizhniy Novgorod 603126.
M. A. Kurochkina
Russian Federation
10/1 Minin & Pozharsky Sq., Nizhny Novgorod 603950.
References
1. Udintsov D.B. Cancer of the cheek mucosa: the choice of treatment tactics and methods of reconstruction. Abstract of dis. … cand. of med. sciences. Moscow, 2009. 26 p. Available at: https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01003477616#?page=1 (In Russ.).
2. Shinkarev S.A., Kozlovskaya E.V., Podolsky V.N. New potentials for trapezius musculocutaneous flap in oncology. Vestnik RONC im. N.N. Blokhina RAMN = Journal of N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center RAMS 2008;19(3):80–6. (In Russ.).
3. Ariyan S. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. A versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;63(1):73–81. PMID: 372988.
4. Shah J.P., Haribhakti V., Loree T.R. et al. Complications of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction. Am J Surg 1990;160(4):352–5. PMID: 2221234.
5. Dobrokhotova V.Z. Analysis of complications of reconstructive surgical operations regarding malignant tumors in the mouth cavity. Dis. … cand. of med. sciences. Мoscow, 2006. 122 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Sikorsky D.V., Podvyaznikov S.О., Volodin A.N., Bazanov K.V., Molkova E.A., Kopeykina M.I., Egorov A.A., Kurochkina M.A. Pectoral and trapezoidal flaps for reconstruction of full-thickness post-resection defect in combination treatment of locally advanced buccal cancer. Head and Neck Tumors (HNT). 2019;9(1):28-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2019-9-1-28-37