Does morphology have real impact on local and distant recurrences in head and neck cutaneous melanoma?

Introduction. The term “local recurrence” is usually understood as regrowth of a tumor after surgical treatment. The regrowth appears within 3–5 cm from postoperative cicatrix. The causes for such prolonged tumor growth or recurrence of patients with cutaneous melanoma are nonradical surgical treatment as well as satellite or transit metastases that were not removed in-block with primary tumor. A great number of clinical researches, aimed at examination of melanoma, its patterns, anatomical criteria and features of clinical course, gave an opportunity to separate satellite or transit metastases into an independent group. Such metastases are realized inside or subdermally, up to 2 cm or more than 2 cm from the primary tumor, yet, not reaching the location of the first regional barrier.

The aim of the study is to define influence of the main prognostic factors such as tumor thickness according to Breslow, the level of invasion according to Clark and the presence of ulceration on the frequency of local recurrence with cutaneous melanoma of head and neck.

Materials and methods. The research involved 174 patients with cutaneous melanoma of head and neck (1995–2014). According to our index of contraction of a skin flap (median 30 %) the true borders of resection were clearly defined within all the patients. Thereby, 3 groups were identified with the following resection margin: 1.0 cm, where followed-up treatment results were analyzed.

Results. Progression-free survival didn’t correlate with the size of surgical resection margins. The survival rates were the best with the lowest resection margin under 0.5 cm (77.3 %) and the worst with the highest resection margin more then 1.0 cm (38.7 %). That means that the treatment results don’t depend on the width increase of tumor resection margin.

Conclusions. We consider that clear surgical margins for any thickness of cutaneous melanoma of head and neck should be as follows: 4 mm – 0.72 mm (p = 0.016). In our work, the influence of the main prognostic factors, such as tumor thickness according to Breslow, level of invasion according to Clark and ulceration on the frequency of head and neck cutaneous melanoma local recurrences had no impact.

1. Allakhverdyan G.S., Chekalova M.A., Kokosadze N.V. Preoperative assessment of the local spread of primary cutaneous melanoma using ultrasound. Ultrazvukovaya i funktsionalnaya diagnostika = Ultrasound and functional diagnostics 2007;(4):238–9. (In Russ.).

2. Balch C.M., Soong S.J., Murad T.M. et al. A multi factorial analysis of melanoma. II. Prognostic factors in patients with stage I (localized) melanoma. Surgery 1979;86(2):343–51.

3. Paches A.I. Head and neck tumors: Clinical guideline. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2013. P. 60–69. (In Russ.).

4. Friedman R.J., Rigel S., Kopf A.W. Early detection of malignant melanoma: the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin. CA Cancer J Clin 1985;35(3):130–51. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.35.3.130.

5. Friedman R.J., Rigel D.S., Silverman M.K. et. al. Malignant melanoma in the 1990’s: The continued importance of early detection and the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin. CA Cancer J Clin 1991;41(4):201–26. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.41.4.201.

6. Rigel D.S., Kopf A.W., Friedman R.J. The rate of malignant melanoma in the United States: are we making an impact? J Am Acad Dermatol 1987;17(6):1050–3. DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(87)80487-5.

7. Malishevskaya N.P., Sokolova A.B., Demidov L.V. The incidence of skin melanoma in the russian federation and federal districts. Meditsinsky sovet = Medical Сouncil 2018;(10):161–5. (In Russ.).

8. Balch C.M., Hjugton A.N., Peters L.I. Cutaneous melanoma. In: Principles and practice of oncology. Ed. by V.I. De Vita, S. Hellman, S.A. Rosenberg. 4th edn. Philadelphia: Lippencott Co., 1993. P. 1612–1661.

9. Elder D.E., Guerry D.V., Heiberger R.M. et al. Optimal resection margin for cutaneous malignant melanoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;71(1):66–72. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198301000-00015.

10. Bodurtha A.J. Spontaneous regression of malignant melanoma. In: Human malignant melanoma. Ed. by W.H. Clark, L.J. Goldmarm, M.J. Mastrangelo. New York; San Francisco; London: Game & Stratton, 1979. P. 227–241.

11. Spellman J.E. Jr, Driscoll D., Velez A., Karakousis C. Thick cutaneuos melanoma of the trunk and extremities: an institutional review. Surg Oncol 1994;3(6):335–43. DOI: 10.1016/0960-7404(94)90072-8.

12. Taylor B.A., Hughes L.E. A policy of selective excision for primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 1985;11(1):7–13.

13. Urist M.M., Balch C.M., Soong S.J. et al. Head and neck melanoma in 534 clinical stage I patients. A prognostic factors analysis and results of surgical treatment. Ann Surg 1984;200(6):769–75. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198412000-00017.

14. Urist M.M., Maddox W.A., Kennedy J., Balch C.M. Patient risk factors and surgical morbidity after regional lymphadenectomy in 204 melanoma patients. Cancer 1983;51(11):2l52–6.

15. Anisimov V.V. Content of the concept of “local recurrence” after surgical treatment of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Voprosy onkologii = Problems in Oncology 1985;31(1):32–7. (In Russ.).

16. Trapeznikov N.N., Raben A.S., Yavorski V.V., Titiner G.B. Pigmented nevi and skin neoplasms. Moscow: Meditsina, 1976. P. 177. (In Russ.).

17. Beardmore G.L., Davis N.C. Multiple primary cutaneous melanomas. Arch Dermatol 1975;11:603–9.

18. Cascinelli N., Bajetta E., Vaglini M. et al. Present status and future perspectives of adjuvant treatment of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Pigment Cell Res 1983;6:187–98.

19. Stage I melanoma of the skin: the problem of resection margins. W.H.O. Collaborating Centres for Evaluation of Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment of Melanoma. Eur J Cancer 1980;16(8):1079–85.

20. Day C.L., Harrist T.J., Gorstein F. et al. Prognostic significance of “microscopic satellites” in the reticular dermis and subcutaneous fat. Ann Surg 1981;194(1):108–12. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198107000-00019.

21. Levine A. On the histological diagnosis and prognosis of malignant melanoma. J Clin Pathol 1980;33(2):101–24. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.33.2.101.

22. Banzet P., Thomas A., Vuillemin E. Wide versus narrow surgical excision in thin (<2 mm) stage I primary cutaneous melanoma: long term results of a French multicentric prospective randomized trial on 319 patients. Proc Am Assoc Clin Oncol 1993;12:387.

23. Khayat D., Rixe O., Martin G. et al. Surgical margins in cutaneous melanoma (2 cm versus 5 cm for lesions measuring less than 2.1-mm thick). Cancer 2003; 97(8):1941–6. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11272.

24. Cohn-Cedermark G., Rutqvist L.E., Andersson R. et al. Long term results of a randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group on 2-cm versus 5-cm resection margins for patients with cutaneous melanoma with a tumor thickness of 0.8– 2.0 mm. Cancer 2000;89(7):1495–501.

25. Ringborg U., Andersson R., Eldh J. et al. Resection margins of 2 versus 5 cm for cutaneous malignant melanoma with a tumor thickness of 0.8 to 2.0 mm: randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group. Cancer 1996;77(9):1809–14.

26. Cascinelli N., Belli F., Santinami M. et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma: the WHO Melanoma Program experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7(6):469–74. DOI: 10.1007/s10434-000-0469-z.

27. Veronesi U., Cascinelli N. Narrow excision (1-cm margin). A safe procedure for thin cutaneous melanoma. Arch Surg 1991;126(4):438–41. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410280036004.

28. Balch C.M., Urist M.M., Karakousis C.P. et al. Efficacy of 2-cm surgical margins for intermediate-thickness melanomas (1 to 4 mm). Results of a multiinstitutional randomized surgical trial.

29. Ann Surg 1993;218(3):262–7. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199309000-00005.

30. Balch C.M., Soong S.J., Smith T. et al. Long-term results of a prospective surgical trial comparing 2 cm vs. 4 cm excision margins for 740 patients with 1–4 mm melanomas. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8(2):101–8. DOI: 10.1007/s10434-001-0101-x.

31. Karakousis C.P., Balch C.M., Urist M.M. et al. Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: long-term results of the multiinstitutional randomized surgical trial. Ann Surg Oncol 1996;3(5):446–52. DOI: 10.1007/BF02305762.

32. Thomas J.M., Newton-Bishop J., A’Hern R. et al. Excision margins in highrisk malignant melanoma. N Engl J Med 2004;350(8):757–66. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa030681.

33. Ringborg U., Brahme E.M., Drewiecki K. Randomized trial of a resection margin of 2 cm versus 4 cm for cutaneous malignant melanoma with a tumor thickness of more than 2 mm. In: World Congress on Melanoma. Vancouver, 2005.

34. Wheatley K., Wilson J.S., Gaunt P., Marsden J.R. Surgical excision margins in primary cutaneous melanoma: a metaanalysis and Bayesian probability evaluation. Cancer Treat Rev 2016;42:73–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.10.013.

35. Breslow A. Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg 1970;172:902–8.

36. Balch C.M., Houghton A.N., Sober A.J. et al. Thompson complex closures of melanoma excisions. In: Cutaneous melanoma. 5th edn. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 2009. P. 275–319.

37. Barchuk L.S. Surgical treatment of melanoma. Prakticheskaya onkologiya = Practical Oncology 2001;(34):30–6. (In Russ.).

38. Bagley F.H., Cady B., Lee A. et al. Changes in clinical preservation and management of malignant melanoma. Cancer 1981;47:2126–34.

39. Gershenwald J.E., Scolyer R.A., Hess K.R. et al. Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67(6):472–92. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21409.