Clinical guidelines and expediency of using 5-aminolevulinic acid for intraoperative visualization of margins of malignant tumors of the oral cavity
https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2022-12-2-33-40
Abstract
Introduction. Treatment of the oral cavity is an important problem of current oncology due to high morbidity and mortality reaching 43 % in 5-year period after diagnosis. frequency of positive resection margins is 30 % of cases which partially explains unsatisfactory results of therapy of this pathology and promotes investigation of methods increasing radicalness of surgical treatment of the primary lesion.
The study objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of fluorescent visualization with 5-aminolevulinic acid for assessment of radicalness of surgical intervention in cancer of the oral mucosa.
Materials and methods. In the study, evaluation of the effectiveness of 5-aminolevulinic acid for intraoperative determination of margins of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral mucosa (n = 36) was performed.
Results. Comparison of intraoperative results using 5-aminolevulinic acid and results of histological examination showed that the difference in mean distances from the tumor edge to resection margin was 0.07 mm (95 % confidence interval 2.2905-2.4334) and wasn't statistically significant (p = 0.9519). Sensitivity of intraoperative fluorescent visualization with 5-aminolevulinic acid in diagnosis of resection margins was 100 %, specificity was 92.3 %, accuracy was 92.9 %, effectiveness was 96.1 %. Optimal effect of the fluorescent technique was achieved in patients with exophytic and mixed types of tumor growth without previous treatment.
Conclusion. Method of intraoperative fluorescent visualization with 5-aminolevulinic acid showed high effectiveness (96.1 %) and can be recommended for intraoperative assessment of tumor margins and increase of radicalness of surgical treatment of cancer of the oral mucosa.
Keywords
About the Authors
Yu. V. AlymovRussian Federation
Yuri V. Alymov.
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478.
A. V. Ignatova
Russian Federation
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478; 6Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198.
I. S. Romanov
Russian Federation
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478.
References
1. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2015 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, G.V. Petrov. Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow State Medical Research Institute - branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “NMIRC” of the Ministry of Health of Russia, 2018. (In Russ.).
2. Kim M.Y., Kim C.S., Lee S.H. et al. A clinicostatistical analysis of oral cancer patients for recent 8 years. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;33:660-8.
3. Lee J.W., Kim J.W., Kim C.S. A clinic-statistical study on cervical lymph node metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;34:594-601.
4. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Head and Neck Cancers. 2022. Version 1. Доступно по: https://www.nccn.org.
5. Woolgar J.A., Triantafyllou A. A histopathological appraisal of surgical margins in oral and oropharyngeal cancer resection specimens. Oral Oncol 2005;41(10): 1034-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.06.008.
6. McMahon J., O'Brien C.J., Pathak I. et al. Influence of condition of surgical margins on local recurrence and diseasespecificsurvival in oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;41(4):224-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-4356(03)00119-0.
7. Ravasz L.A., Slootweg P.J., Hordijk G.J. et al. The status of the resection margin as a prognostic factor in the treatment of head and neck carcinoma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1991;19(7):314-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80339-7.
8. Filonenko E.V. History of the development of fluorescent diagnostics and photodynamic therapy and their possibilities in oncology. Rossijskij himicheskij zhurnal = Russian Chemical Journal 2013;LVII(2). (In Russ.).
9. Potapov A.A., Goriainov S.A., Okhlopkov V.A. et al. Clinical guidelines for the use of intraoperative fluorescence diagnosis in brain tumor surgery. Voprosy Neirokhirurgii Imeni N.N. Burdenko = Questions of N.N. Burdenko Neurosurgery 2015;79(5):91-101. (In Russ., In Engl.). DOI: 10.17116/neiro201579591-101.
10. Leunig A., Betz C.S., Mehlmann M. et al. Detection of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity by imaging 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin ix fluorescence. Laryngoscope 2000;110(1):78-83. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200001000-00015.
11. Vakulovskaya E.G., Stratonnikov A.A. Fluorescent diagnostics with photosensitizer Alasens in patients with cancer of the oral mucosa. Rossijskij bioterapevticheskij zhurnal = Russian Biotherapeutic Journal 2005;4(4):109-13. (In Russ.).
12. Ramachandra M., Mohiyuddin S.M.A., Suresh T.N. et al. Evaluating usefulness of 5-aminolevulinic acid induced fluorescence to guide biopsy of oral cancers and premalignant lesions. Int J Head Neck Surg 2015;6(2):64-8.
Review
For citations:
Alymov Yu.V., Ignatova A.V., Romanov I.S. Clinical guidelines and expediency of using 5-aminolevulinic acid for intraoperative visualization of margins of malignant tumors of the oral cavity. Head and Neck Tumors (HNT). 2022;12(2):33-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2022-12-2-33-40