FEASIBILITY OF INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF CT2N0M0 CANCER OF THE ORAL MUCOSA
https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2017-7-2-37-44
Abstract
Introduction. The issue of selecting treatment strategy for сT2N0M0 cancer of the oral mucosa remains relevant. Induction chemotherapy (applied in order to evaluate the possibility of organ-preserving chemoradiotherapy) is widely used in clinical practice. In this case, surgical treatment is performed only when chemotherapy (CT) is ineffective or a residual tumor is detected after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, many specialists recommend surgical treatment on the first stage of treatment.
Objective: evaluation of the induction chemotherapy feasibility in the treatment of T2N0M0 cancer of the oral mucosa.
Materials and methods. A total of 122 patients with primary Т2N0М0 cancer of oral mucosa without regional metastases (according to clinical examination) were included in the study.
Results. In order to determine the best treatment strategy, we have compared treatment outcomes in three groups of patients. The most favorable outcomes were observed in the group of patients receiving combined treatment according to a scheme «surgery + radiotherapy (RT)/ CRT, where the overall 5-year survival rate and the progression-free 5-year survival rate were 70.4 % and 68.5 % respectively. Survival rate in this group was significantly higher (р < 0.05) than that in the group «induction CT (ICT) ± RT ± surgery» where these parameters comprised 42.2 % and 36.2 % respectively.
Conclusion. Combined treatment with a surgery on the first stage followed by RT or CRT ensures better outcomes of the cancer of the oral mucosa than the strategies that include ICT.
About the Authors
I. S. RomanovRussian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
I. M. Gelfand
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
D. B. Udintsov
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
A. A. Akhundov
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
K. D. Ilkaev
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
References
1. Давыдов М.И., Аксель Е.М. Статистика злокачественных новообразований 2014 г.: Данные по России. Евразийский онкологический журнал 2016;4(4):824–61. [Davydov M.I., Aksel E.M. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2014. Evraziisliy onkologicheskiy zhurnal = Eurasian Journal of Oncology 2016;4 (4):824–61. (In Russ.)]
2. Edge S.B., Byrd D.R., Compton C.C. et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer, 2010.
3. Матякин Е.Г. Клинические аспекты регионарного метастазирования рака языка и гортани. Дис. … д-ра мед. наук. М., 1988. [Маtyakin Е.G. Clinical aspects of the regional tongue and pharynx metastases. Author’s abstract of thesis … of doctor of medicine. Мoscow, 1988. (In Russ.)].
4. Tankéré F., Camproux A., Barry B. et al. Prognostic value of lymph node involvement in oral cancers: a study of 137 cases. Laryngoscope 2000;110(12):2061–5. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200012000-00016. PMID: 11129021.
5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network USA. – 2015. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/head-and-neck. pdf.
6. Минимальные клинические рекомендации Европейского общества медицинской онкологии (ЕSМО) Ред. рус. пер.: С.А. Тюляндин, Д.А. Носов, Н.И. Переводчикова. М.: РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН, 2010. Доступно на: http://www.rosoncoweb.ru/library/treatment/esmo2010/ESMO_2010. pdf. [Minimal Clinical Recommendations of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Transl. ed. By S.A. Tylyandin, D.A. Nosov, N.I. Perevodchikova. Moscow: N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, 2010. Available at: http://www.rosoncoweb.ru/library/treatment/esmo2010/ESMO_2010. pdf. (In Russ.)].
7. Chinn S.B., Spector M.E., Bellile E.L. et al. Efficacy of induction selection chemotherapy vs primary surgery for patients with advanced oral cavity carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140(2):134–42. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5892. PMID: 24370563.
8. Umeda M., Komatsubara H., Ojima Y. et al. Lack of survival advantage in patients with advanced, resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity receiving induction chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP), docetaxel (TXT) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Kobe J Med Sci 2004;50 (5–6):189–96. PMID: 16107776.
9. Sher D.J., Thotakura V., Balboni T.A. et al. Treatment of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with adjuvant or definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;81(4):215–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.023. PMID: 21531515.
10. Studer G., Zwahlen R., Graetz K. et al. IMRT in oral cavity cancer. Radiat Oncol 2007;2:16. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-2–16. PMID: 17430599.
11. Al-Rajhi N., Khafaga Y., El-Husseiny J. et al. Early stage carcinoma of oral tongue: prognostic factors for local control and survival. Oral Oncol 2000;36 (6):508–14. PMID: 11036243.
12. Ganly I., Patel S., Shah J. Early stage squamous cell cancer of the oral tongue. Clinicopathologic Features Affecting Outcome. Cancer 2012;118 (1):101–11. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26229. PMID: 21717431.
13. Ensley J.F., Jacobs J.R., Weaver A. et al. Correlation between response to cisplatinum-combination chemotherapy and subsequent radiotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced squamous cell cancers of the head and neck. Cancer 1984;54(5):811–4. PMID: 6204738.
14. Собин Л.Х., Господарович М.К., Виттекинд К. TNM. Классификация злокачественных опухолей. Пер. с англ. и научн. ред. А.И. Щеголева, Е.А. Дубовой, К.А. Павлова. М.: Логосфера, 2011. [Sоbin L.H., Gospodarovich М.K., Wittekind К. TNM: classification of malignant tumors. Мoscow: Logosfera, 2011. Pp. 35–9. (In Russ.)].
Review
For citations:
Romanov I.S., Gelfand I.M., Udintsov D.B., Akhundov A.A., Ilkaev K.D. FEASIBILITY OF INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF CT2N0M0 CANCER OF THE ORAL MUCOSA. Head and Neck Tumors (HNT). 2017;7(2):37-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2017-7-2-37-44