Reconstruction of full-thickness chick defects formed after tumor removal using a modified technique for submental flap dissection
https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2018-8-2-27-33
Abstract
Reconstruction of vast penetrating defects after radical resection of advanced tumors of the head and neck is a complex problem of reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery. In case of a vast full-thickness defect of the chick, it is necessary to create isolated walls both inside and outside the oral cavity, i.e. to perform two-layer reconstruction. In most articles, use of 2 distant flaps or a double folded free revascularized autologous transplant are described. However, performance of such large-scale and long surgical interventions can be limited by patient’s age or functional status, as well as other objective factors.
In reconstruction of full-thickness chick defects, a submental flap is an adequate alternative to a free revascularized autologous transplant. This surgery is technically much easier and produces a better esthetic effect compared to the use of a combination of temporal myofacial and cervicofacial flaps, as well as a double cervicopectoral flap. The proposed modification of the method–sialoadenectomy at the stage prior to harvesting of the pedicle flap – not only makes dissection easier but allows to determine tumor advancement. Temporal ligation of the facial artery above the branching site of the submental artery reduces blood loss during removal of a primary tumor of the chick.
About the Authors
Ch. R. RahimovAzerbaijan
23 Bakikhanov St., Baku, AZ 1022
A. A. Akhundov
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
I. М. Farzaliev
Azerbaijan
23 Bakikhanov St., Baku, AZ 1022
M. Ch. Rahimli
Azerbaijan
23 Bakikhanov St., Baku, AZ 1022
Sh. E. Kuliev
Azerbaijan
23 Bakikhanov St., Baku, AZ 1022
D. A. Safarov
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478
References
1. George R.K., Krishnamurthy A. Micro-surgical free flaps: controversies in maxillofacial reconstruction. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2013;3(1):72–9. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.110059. PMID: 23662264.
2. Chen W., Zeng S., Li J. et al. Reconstruction of full-thickness cheek defects with combined temporalis myofacial and facial-cervico-pectoral flaps. Oral Surg Oral MedOral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103(1):e10–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.07.009. PMID: 17178479.
3. Bucci T., Fior A., Nocini P.F. Reconstruction of full-thickness cheek defect with a folded cervico-pectoral cutaneous flap following ablation of advanced oral cancer in elderly patient. Eur J Plast Surg 2018;41(1):89–92. DOI: 10.1007/s00238-017-1350-7.
4. Martin D., Pascal J.F., Baudet J. et al. Thesubmental island flap: a new donor site. Anatomy and clinical applications as a free or pedicled flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92(5):867–73. PMID: 8415968.
5. Paydarfar J.A., Patel U.A. Submental island pedicled flap vs radial forearm free flap for oral reconstruction: comparison of outcomes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;137(1):82–7. DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2010.204. PMID: 21242553.
6. Chow T.L., Chan T.T., Chow T.K. et al. Reconstruction with submental flap for aggressive orofacial cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120(2):431–6. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000267343.10982.dc. PMID: 17632345.
7. Sebastian P., Thomas S., Varghese B.T. et al. The submental island flap for reconstruction of defects in oral cancer patients. Oral Oncol 2008;44(11):1014–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.02.013. PMID: 18620890.
8. Uppin S.B., Ahmad Q.G., Yadav P., Shetty K. Use of the submental island flap in orofacial reconstruction – a review of 20 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62(4):514–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.11.023. PMID: 18248861.
9. Taghinia A.H., Movassaghi K., Wang A.X., Pribaz J.J. Reconstruction of the upper aerodigestive tract with the submental artery flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123(2):562–70. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181977fe4. PMID: 19182614.
10. Amin A.A., Sakkary M.A., Khalil A.A. et al. The submental flap for oral cavity reconstruction: extended indications and technical refinements. Head Neck Oncol 2011;3:51. DOI: 10.1186/1758-3284-3-51. PMID: 22185515.
11. Patel U.A., Bayles S.W., Hayden R.E. The submental flap: a modified technique for resident training. Laryngoscope 2007;117(1):186–9. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000246519.77156.a4. PMID: 17202951.
12. Ramkumar A., Francis N.J., Senthil Kumar R., Dinesh Kumar S. Bipaddled submental artery flap. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41(4):458–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.12.030. PMID: 22260791.
13. Chow T.L., Choi C.Y., Ho L.I., Fung S.C.The use of bipaddled submental flap for reconstructing composite buccal defect. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2014;13(1):75–7. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-013-0477-8. PMID: 24644402.
14. Fernandes R.P. Local and regional flaps in head and neck reconstruction: a practical approach. Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. 264 p.
Review
For citations:
Rahimov Ch.R., Akhundov A.A., Farzaliev I.М., Rahimli M.Ch., Kuliev Sh.E., Safarov D.A. Reconstruction of full-thickness chick defects formed after tumor removal using a modified technique for submental flap dissection. Head and Neck Tumors (HNT). 2018;8(2):27-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2018-8-2-27-33