Preview

Head and Neck Tumors (HNT)

Advanced search

Management of the total glossectomy defect with latissimus dorsi free flap

https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2018-8-2-77-82

Abstract

Radical surgical management of tongue cancer results in sever speech and swallowing disruption, impaired airway protection and life-threatening aspiration. Surgical objective of total glossectomy defect management is an adequate restoration of lingual mass and affected tissues   of the floor of the mouth. Range of flaps are known to provide the adequate outcome, i. e. pediculed pectoralis major flap, anterolateral free thigh flap, rectus abdominis flap, radial free forearm flap and latissimus dorsi flap.

In the current report, we present a case of glossectomy defect reconstruction with pediculed latissimus dorsi flap.

Postoperative assessment of the transplant was made according to clinical criteria and viability of the flap was assessed via laser Doppler flowmetry. Signs of microcirculation improved starting from day 5 postoperatively, and were almost equal with donor site microcirculation signs on day 14. A sufficiently large mass of the transplant allowed to create a thickening over the epiglottis, as well as to close the defect   in the oral cavity. The latissimus dorsi flap in the tongue reconstruction has a high potential: its use provides a relatively good quality of articulation, recovery of deglutition.

About the Authors

M. M. Davudov
Azerbaijan Medical University.
Azerbaijan
23 Bakikhanov St., Baku, AZ 1022


Ch. R. Rahimov
Azerbaijan Medical University.
Azerbaijan
23 Bakikhanov St., Baku, AZ 1022


A. A. Akhundov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia.
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478



F. G. Irannezhat
Azerbaijan Medical University.
Azerbaijan
23 Bakikhanov St., Baku, AZ 1022


Sh. A. Magomedov
Azerbaijan Medical University.
Azerbaijan
23 Bakikhanov St., Baku, AZ 1022


M. Ch. Rahimli
Azerbaijan Medical University.
Azerbaijan
23 Bakikhanov St., Baku, AZ 1022


D. A. Safarov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia.
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115478


References

1. Матякин Е.Г., Голдобенко Г.В., Воробьев Ю.И. и др. К проблеме элективного воздействия на путях лимфооттока при раке подвижной части языка (результаты кооперированного рандомизированного исследования). Вестник РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН 1995;6(1):23–6. [Matyakin E.G., Goldobenko G.V., Vorobiev Yu.I. et al. To the problem of elective treatment of lymph channels in cancer of the tongue movable part (results of a cooperative randomized study). Vestnik RONC im. N.N. Blokhina RAMN = Journal of N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center 1995;6(1):23–6. (In Russ.)].

2. Engel H., Huang J.J., Lin C.Y. et al. A strategic approach for tongue reconstruction to achieve predictable and improved functional and aesthetic outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126(6):1967–77. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f44742. PMID: 21124135.

3. Sultan M.R., Coleman J.J. 3rd. Oncologic and functional considerations of total glossectomy. Am J Surg 1989;158(4):297–302. PMID: 2552853.

4. Yun I.S., Lee D.W., Lee W.J. et al. Correlation of neotongue volume changes withfunctional outcomes after long-term fol-low-up of total glossectomy. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21(1):111–6. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c46692. PMID: 20061966.

5. Kimata Y., Sakuraba M., Hishinuma S. et al. Analysis of the relations between the shape of the reconstructed tongue and postoperative functions after subtotal or total glossectomy. Laryngoscope 2003;113(5):905–9. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200305000-00024. PMID: 12792331.

6. Sinclair C.F., Carroll W.R., Desmond R.A., Rosenthal E.L. Functional and survival outcomes in patients undergoing total glossectomy compared with total laryngo-glossectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;145(5):755–8. DOI: 10.1177/0194599811412724. PMID: 21670476.

7. Hanasono M.M., Skoracki R.J., Yu P. A prospective study of donor-site morbidity after anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous free flap harvest in 220 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125(1):209–14. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c495ed. PMID: 19910852.

8. Miyamoto S., Sakuraba M., Nagamatsu S. et al. Risk factors for gastrictube dependence following tongue reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19(7):2320–6. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2298-2. PMID: 22396003.

9. Ng R.W., Chan J.Y., Mok V. et al. Clinical implications of anterolateral thigh flap shrinkage. Laryngoscope 2008;118(4):585–8. DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816067a3. PMID: 18176347.

10. Lyos A.T., Evans G.R., Perez D., Schusterman M.A. Tongue reconstruction: out-comes with the rectus abdominis flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103(2):442–7. PMID: 9950529.

11. Chien C.Y., Su C.Y., Hwang C.F. et al. Ablation of advanced tongue or base of tongue cancer and reconstruction with free flap: functional outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006;32(3);353–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.12.010. PMID: 16455224.

12. Dziegielewski P.T., Ho M.L., Rieger J. et al. Total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation and free flap reconstruction: objective functional outcomes and systematic review of the literature. Laryngoscope 2013;123(1):140–5. DOI: 10.1002/lary.23505. PMID: 22952109.


Review

For citations:


Davudov M.M., Rahimov Ch.R., Akhundov A.A., Irannezhat F.G., Magomedov Sh.A., Rahimli M.Ch., Safarov D.A. Management of the total glossectomy defect with latissimus dorsi free flap. Head and Neck Tumors (HNT). 2018;8(2):77-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2018-8-2-77-82

Views: 992


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2222-1468 (Print)
ISSN 2411-4634 (Online)