Preview

Head and Neck Tumors (HNT)

Advanced search

Removal of a maxillary tumor with simultaneous placement of intraosseous zygomatic implants

https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2019-9-2-88-94

Abstract

The study objective is to report a case of successful placement of intraosseous zygomatic implants for functional and aesthetic rehabilitation of a patient with a maxillary defect resulted from maxillary resection for right-sided stage IIB maxillary sarcoma (сT2N0M0, G3).

Materials and methods. A 34-year-old male patient visited a doctor in P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute with complaints of maxillary tumor. During the examination of the oral cavity, we found a dense endophytic tumor in the area of two missing teeth (17 and 18) involving the alveolar process and palatine process of the maxilla. Computed tomography revealed destruction of the alveolar process, lateral, medial, and posterior walls of the maxillary sinus on the right, and tumor invasion into the right iliac fossa, pterygopalatine fossa, and right maxillary sinus. We also observed tumor destruction of the right palatine process of the maxilla. The patient was diagnosed with osteogenic sarcoma.

Results. The patient received 4 courses of polychemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin, which resulted in disease stabilization. Then the patient underwent en-block resection of the fragment of the right maxilla with alveolar and palatine processes, fragments of the zygomatic bone, wings of the sphenoid bone on the right side, and adjacent soft tissues. Simultaneously, we placed two zygomatic implants to provide supportfor the maxillary plate denture. To create an additional supporting point, we extracted tooth 11 and installed an implant with external hexagonal connection. Later, we produced and installed a specially designed palatal obturator.

Conclusion. Installation of removable dentures supported by implants ensures complete and rapid rehabilitation, allowing a patient to chew, swallow, and speak normally. A palatal obturator on implants supports the soft tissues of the medial face, thus ensuring complete aesthetic rehabilitation.

About the Authors

S. A. Epifanov
P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia; National Medical and Surgical Center n. a. N.I. Pirogov, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinsky Proezd, Moscow 125284; 70 Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya St., Moscow 105203



A. P. Polyakov
P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinsky Proezd, Moscow 125284



A. V. Mordovskiy
P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinsky Proezd, Moscow 125284



D. V. Dorokhin
National Medical and Surgical Center n. a. N.I. Pirogov, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

70 Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya St., Moscow 105203



O. V. Matorin
P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinsky Proezd, Moscow 125284



I. V. Rebrikova
P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinsky Proezd, Moscow 125284



N. V. Vereshchagina
National Medical and Surgical Center n. a. N.I. Pirogov, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

70 Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya St., Moscow 105203



References

1. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2017 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, G.V. Petrova. Moscow: MNIOI im. PA. Gertzena, 2018. 250 p. (In Russ.). Available at: http://www.oncology.ru/service/statistics/malignant_tumors/2017.pdf.]

2. Turner J.H., Reh D.D. Incidence and survival in patients with sinonasal cancer: a historical analysis of population-based data. Head Neck 2012;34(6):877-85. DOI: 10.1002/hed.21830.

3. Youlden D.R., Cramb S.M., Peters S. et al. International comparisons of the incidence and mortality of sinonasal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol 2013;37(6):770—9. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.09.014.

4. Baqain Z.H., Anabtawi M., Karaky A.A., Malkawi Z. Morbidity from anterior iliac crest bone harvesting for secondary alveolar bone grafting: an outcome assessment study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67(3):570-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.09.023.

5. Chiapasco M., Biglioli F., Autelitano L. et al. Clinical outcome of dental implants placed in fibula-free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects following ablation for tumors or osteoradionecrosis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(2):220-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01212.x.

6. Aparicio C., Branemark P.I., Keller E.E., Olive J. Reconstruction of the premaxilla with autogenous iliac bone in combination with osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8(1):61 —7.

7. Weischer T., Schettler D., Mohr C. Titanium implants in the zygoma as retaining elements after hemimaxillectomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12(2):211 —4.

8. Branemark PI. Surgery and fixture installation. In: Branemark P.I. Zygomaticus fixture: clinical procedures. Gothenburg: Nobel Biocare AB, 1998.

9. Aparicio C., Ouazzani W., Garcia R. et al. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8(3):114—22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00009.x.

10. Aparicio C., Ouazzani W., Hatano N. The use of zygomatic implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla. Periodontal 2000 2008;47:162-71. DOI: 10.nn/j.1600-0757.2008.00259.x.

11. Bedrossian E., Sumpel LJ. 3rd, Beckely M.L., Indresano T. The zygomatic implant; preliminary data on treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17(6):861—5.

12. Aparicio C., Manresa C., Francisco K. et al. The long-term use of zygomatic implants: a 10-year clinical and radiographic report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16(3):447—59. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12007.

13. Fukuda M., Takahashi T., Nagai H., Iino M. Implant-supported edentulous maxillary obturators with milled bar attachments after maxillectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62(7):799—805. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.01.013.

14. Fujimoto T., Niimi A., Ueda M. Implant-supported prostheses after maxillary cancer resection: preliminary report. Implant Dent 1997;6(4):295—8. DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199700640-00006.

15. Ortorp A. Three tumor patients with total maxillectomy rehabilitated with implant-supported frameworks and maxillary obturators: a follow-up report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12(4):315—23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00164.x.

16. Prithviraj D.R., Vashisht R., Bhalla H.K. From maxilla to zygoma: a review on zygomatic implants. J Dent Implant 2014;4:44—7. DOI: 10.4103/0974-6781.130973.

17. Sharma A.B., Beumer J. 3rd. Reconstruction of maxillary defects: the case for prosthetic rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63(12):1770—3. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.013.


Review

For citations:


Epifanov S.A., Polyakov A.P., Mordovskiy A.V., Dorokhin D.V., Matorin O.V., Rebrikova I.V., Vereshchagina N.V. Removal of a maxillary tumor with simultaneous placement of intraosseous zygomatic implants. Head and Neck Tumors (HNT). 2019;9(2):88-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2019-9-2-88-94

Views: 1072


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2222-1468 (Print)
ISSN 2411-4634 (Online)