Robot-assisted removal of the orbital tumor (from practice)
https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2019-9-4-80-84
Abstract
The implementation of robotic surgery, in particular the da Vinci surgical system, is one of the biggest breakthroughs in surgery since the invention of anesthesia, and represents the most significant achievement in minimally invasive surgery of this decade. If the use of the da Vinchi robotic system in pelvic surgery has long been the gold standard, the use of this system in surgery of the base of the skull and sinuses is quite rare and is currently more experimental. Due to the lack of description in the domestic and foreign literature, it seems interesting to us to demonstrate the clinical observation of a patient with an orbital tumor.
About the Authors
V. N. Pavlov
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008
Russian Federation
3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008
R. I. Safiullin
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008
Russian Federation
3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008
R. R. Bakiev
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008
Russian Federation
3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008
R. F. Gilmanova
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008
Russian Federation
3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008
M. F. Urmantsev
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008
Russian Federation
3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008
References
1. Ng A.T., Tam P.C. Current status of robot-assisted surgery. Hong Kong Med J 2014;20(3):241–50. DOI: 10.12809/hkmj134167.
2. Pugin F., Bucher P., Morel P. History of robotic surgery: from AESOP ® and ZEUS ® to da Vinci® . J Visc Surg 2011;148(5 Suppl):e3–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.04.007.
3. Intuitive Surgical company website. Available at: http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/company/media/publications/da-vinci-surgeryhigh-LOE-publications-en031114.pdf.
4. Menon M., Tewari A., Baize B. et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotassisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002;60(5):864–8. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01881-2.
5. Hanna E.Y., Holsinger C., DeMonte F., Kupferman M. Robotic endoscopic surgery of the skull base: a novel surgical approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133(12):1209–14. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.133.12.1209.
6. O’Malley B.W. Jr, Weinstein G.S. Robotic anterior and midline skull base surgery: preclinical investigations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69(2 Suppl):125–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.028.
7. Lee J.Y., O’Malley B.W. Jr, Newman J.G. et al. Transoral robotic surgery of the skull base: a cadaver and feasibility study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2010;72(4):181–7. DOI: 10.1159/000276937.
8. McCool R.R., Warren F.M., Wiggins R.H. 3rd , Hunt J.P. Robotic surgery of the infratemporal fossa utilizing novel suprahyoid port. Laryngoscope 2010;120(9):1738–43. DOI: 10.1002/lary.21020.
Review
For citations:
Pavlov V.N., Safiullin R.I., Bakiev R.R., Gilmanova R.F., Urmantsev M.F. Robot-assisted removal of the orbital tumor (from practice). Head and Neck Tumors (HNT). 2019;9(4):80-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-1468-2019-9-4-80-84
Views:
679
Email this article 