Selective opioid agonist Taphalgin® as a component of postoperative analgesia in various surgical areas: “NIKITA” observational multicenter study

Introduction. The role of peptides in antinociceptive system regulation has became a subject of interest for scientists worldwide. The first registered peptide analgesic tyrosyl-D-arginyl-phenylalanyl-glycinamide acetate which currently can be used in clinical practice was developed in Russia under the name Taphalgin® (PharmFirma “Sotex”, Russia). The effectiveness and safety of this pharmaceutical in postoperative pain management was evaluated in the all-Russia multicenter prospective observation program NICITA (Non-interventional Clinical Trial of Taphalgin ®).

Aim. To analyze the effectiveness and safety of Taphalgin® in postoperative pain management in various surgical fields.

Materials and methods. The observational program NICITA included 887 patients including patients with malignant tumors of various locations from 15 study centers in different Russian cities. All patients underwent surgical interventions in various anatomical areas under general, regional and combination anesthesia. The principal scheme of postoperative pain management was based on the multimodal approach which included peptide opioid agonist alongside acetaminophen, cyclooxygenase inhibitors in combination with regional anesthesia or without it. The study also included patients who underwent small-volume surgeries, and pain was managed through Taphalgin® monotherapy with subsequent switch to cyclooxygenase inhibitors. The primary endpoint of the NICITA observational program was response to therapy after the first Taphalgin® administration. Decreased pain syndrome per the numerical rating scale 15–60 min after subcutaneous injection and maintenance of analgesic effect 3 h later were considered treatment response. The secondary endpoints included mean time to analgesia start after administration of the 1st single drug dose (in min), duration of effect, types and frequency of adverse reactions including serious in the central nervous system, pulmonary system, gastrointestinal tract developed during the observational program, as well as patient and research physician satisfaction with pain management. To evaluate the significance of pain intensity change at rest and in motion in time, analysis of variance with repeat measurements was used; for pairwise comparison of two time periods, Student’s t-test for dependent samples was used. The differences were considered significant at p = 0.05.

Results. Statistically significant decrease in pain intensity in the total patient group was observed 15 minutes after Taphalgin® administration; it reached its minimum 40 min after the injection (р <0.05). The percentage of patients responding to analgesic therapy with Taphalgin® was 96.5 %. During administration of the drug, insignificant decrease (10–15 mmHg) in arterial blood pressure (1.7 % of cases) and vertigo (1 % of cases) were observed. In some patients, several adverse reactions were observed. Satisfaction with analgesic effect of Taphalgin® was relatively high both in patients and research physicians.

Conclusion. Taphalgin® has pronounced analgesic effect and is effective for pain management after surgical interventions of various volumes and injury level. The use of this drug is associated with low rate of adverse reactions and absence of pulmonary depression characterizing opioid agonists. Therefore, Taphalgin® can be recommended for clinical use for postoperative pain management after various types of surgical interventions.

1. Xie H., Chen S.H., Li L., Ge W.H. The cost-effectiveness analysis of analgesic treatment options for postoperative pain following laparotomy surgeries. Int J Clin Pharm 2023;45(2):355–63. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01473-w

2. Armstrong R.A., Fayaz A., Manning G.L.P. et al. Predicting severe pain after major surgery: a secondary analysis of the Peri-operative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP) dataset. Anaesthesia 2023;78(7):840–52. DOI: 10.1111/anae.15984

3. Sandier A.N. Update on postoperative pain management. Mise à jour sur le traitement de la douleur postopératoire. Can J Anaesth 1992;39(Suppl. 1):R53. DOI: 10.1007/BF03008843

4. Burgess J., Hedrick T. Postoperative analgesia in enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: trends and updates. Am Surg 2023;89(2):178–82. DOI: 10.1177/00031348221103654

5. Khavinson V.K. Peptides and ageing. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2002;23(3):11–144.

6. Owji H., Nezafat N., Negahdaripour M. et al. A comprehensive review of signal peptides: structure, roles, and applications. Eur J Cell Biol 2018;97(6):422–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2018.06.003

7. Vanyushin B.F., Khavinson V.Kh. Short biologically active peptides as epigenetic modulators of gene activity. In: Epigenetics – a different way of looking at genetics. Ed. By W. Doerfler, P. Böhm. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2016. Pp. 69–90.

8. Deygin V.I. Development of original peptide drugs: the situation in Russia and in the world. Vestnik biotekhnologii i fizikokhimicheskoy biologii im. Yu.A. Ovchinnikova = Bulletin of Biotechnology and Physico-chemical Biology named after Yu.A. Ovchinnikov 2010;6(1):63–4. (In Russ.).

9. Shabanov P.D. Pharmacology of drugs peptide structure. Psikhofarmakologiya i biologicheskaya narkologiya = Pharmacology and Biological Narcology 2008;3–4:2399–425. (In Russ.).

10. Shabanov P.D., Lebedev A.A., Kornilov V.A. et al. Psychopharmacological profile of noot-ropic peptides. Psikhofarmakologiya i biologicheskaya narkologiya = Pharmacology and Biological Narcology 2009;9(1–2):2517–23. (In Russ.).

11. Karelov A.E., Kosorukov V.S., Kraevskaya Yu.N. et al. The effectiveness of the new peptide analgesic Tafalgin® in the treatment of postoperative pain. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya = Anesthesiology and Intensive Care 2023;6:75–83. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/anaesthesiology202306175